Term events attended through June 30, 2026.
Harry Flaherty
Alternate Deputy Mayor
Term council meetings attended through June 30, 2026.
26 in 2025 · 8 in 2026 through August 25. 26 classified substantive across both years.
2023, 2024 and 2025 use audited written minutes. The 2024 plus sign remains until audio is checked. The 2026 floor uses 23 minute sets plus five complete audio audits through August 25.
One formula used across the Site
Same cutoff and records as the Attendance page: January 2024 through June 2026. This is not verified payroll and it is not a performance grade. The archive begins November 14, 2023, but a comparable 2023 quarterly attendance grid has not yet been indexed.
Compare attendance across both terms · 2019–2023 attendance records
Attendance by year and quarter
The headline above combines these same City reports. These smaller periods explain the total; they are not competing scores.
City quarterly attendance grids.
City quarterly attendance grids.
City Q1 and Q2 attendance grids.
Land deadline
Moved a committee recommendation extending the construction deadline for Lot 27, Block 242.
Official record ↗Read 2 audio-reviewed questions
How can Economic Development assist people who want to start a business?
- Answer on record
- Economic Development said needs vary, but staff can provide one-on-one guidance, identify resources and help entrepreneurs navigate available programs.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
Are applicants' outstanding arrears to the City considered when quarry and land-use permits are reviewed?
- Answer on record
- Planning said an arrears check is required for all departmental applications under the Land Administration By-law and General Plan.
- Wording
- Verified précis checked against the complete recording and official written record.
This ledger contains only completed full-audio audits. It does not treat unaudited recordings as silence, and it remains separate from the complete 2025 written-question ledger.
Read 7 questions from 2023
Was QIA Lands consulted about development beside Inuit Owned Land?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said QIA had been consulted through the application process.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had community consultation occurred about the site used by hunters and berry pickers?
- Answer recorded
- Planning described the public process and said the proponent had consulted nearby land interests.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was there a master plan for land beside Road to Nowhere?
- Answer recorded
- Planning described the General Plan and future subdivision planning.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
How would direct disposal in ATCO Loop work?
- Answer recorded
- Planning explained that consolidation and direct disposal would regularize the existing development pattern.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had a green-space or public-use option been considered for the Lake Subdivision lot?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the institutional designation permitted public uses and council would determine the disposal process.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would council receive a report showing the cost and timeline for the five planned 2024 water projects?
- Answer recorded
- The project team said detailed dashboard reporting was available and monthly reporting could be provided.
- Result or follow-up
- Detailed monthly reporting and possible presentations were discussed.
Was the long-term water project's completion timeline comparable with other Colliers projects?
- Answer recorded
- The project team discussed design and construction milestones and the complexity of Iqaluit's program.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Six additional November 21 questions were recorded without a speaker’s name. They appear in the meeting and year totals but are not assigned to any profile.
Read 24 questions from 2024
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for a summary of existing projects.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard commented that a workshop should be held to discuss the Engineering and Public Works projects that are being carried out. He advised that public consultation during the budget process had not been carried out.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked if the Capital planning process included community consultations.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard commented that a workshop should be held to discuss the Engineering and Public Works projects that are being carried out. He advised that public consultation during the budget process had not been carried out.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the new Capital Spending Plan projects could be highlighted.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard pointed out that the first section listed the 2023 carryover projects, which were budgeted in 2023 and would be completed in 2024. He pointed out that the ongoing sewer and water upgrades had different projects budgeted each year.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the Procurement By-law required purchases to be called under a public tender process.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Mugford advised that the Procurement By-law outlined how to call a public tender and the standard and practices for procurement are followed.
- Result or follow-up
- Check later records for a result.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for clarification on Public Works and Transportation, contracted costs.
- Answer recorded
- Councillor Sheppard explained that the contracted costs related to the water breaks and the requirement to call in third-party contractors.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked for the definition of a capital item.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Tumilty explained that capital assets were long-term assets that were expected to have a useful life of more than one year and are depreciated over time to reflect their use. He also noted that capital expenditures were purchases of assets that exceeded $5,000 or $10,000. Mr. Tumilty pointed out that normal repair and maintenance was not considered a capital expense, but whenever it is improved, the costs are capitalized and the value added to the asset.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for clarification regarding the proposed building having both residential and commercial space.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Michael Croteau explained that the proposed structure could include one or two housing units located above the commercial space.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for clarification regarding the relocation of the sewer line.
- Answer recorded
- Samantha Toffolo explained that one buried sewer line runs through the parking area and serves Qulliq Energy Corporation. Under the concept plan it would not have to be relocated, and parking stalls could not be placed within the easement.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the increase in the delegated authority was for a specified time.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds advised that increasing the delegated authority did not have a time limit. He noted that whenever General Plan By-law No. 898 and Zoning By-law No. 899 were being reviewed, changes could be made.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the cost of the three trucks fell within the approved Capital Spending Plan.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. England confirmed that the purchase amount was within the approved budget.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked for clarification regarding reading of water meters and when the property owner was responsible.
- Answer recorded
- Steve England, Chief Administrative Officer, explained that the property line was used to determine responsibility of the City and property owner.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty noted that the Astro Hill complex had been growing for the past few years and asked if a Traffic Study had been conducted as the area was busy.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds noted that traffic, access and parking was a concern at Astro Hill and perhaps a Traffic Study should be conducted.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked if the proposed development was part of the Rapid Housing Plan.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds noted that the proposed development fell within the study area to increase building heights. He explained that amendments to the General Plan and Zoning By-law regarding the Housing Accelerator Fund and Housing Action Plan take up to ten months for approval. In the meantime, variances would have to be approved on an as-needed basis.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if a questionnaire was available at the aquatic centre for users to provide input regarding the designation of the saunas.
- Answer recorded
- Deputy Mayor Smith explained that this was a recommendation and no public consultation has been held.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked for clarification on Tower Arctic Ltd.
- Answer recorded
- Ms. Adeleke advised that Dillon Consulting Limited designed the bridge and their contract expired in 2022 and was not extended as the project was not approved for the 2023 Capital Spending Plan. Ms. Adeleke explained that in order to provide support during the tendering process, Dillon Consulting Limited had a contract for engineering support to enable them to review bids and provide input during the tendering process.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty noted that he received comments from community members that they have been asked to not walk dogs in the area.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds advised that no community engagement had been held in the Plateau area regarding the matter. Mr. Dodds noted the concern and indicated he would investigate the matter.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked if there has been any community engagement in the Plateau area.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds advised that no community engagement had been held in the Plateau area regarding the matter. Mr. Dodds noted the concern and indicated he would investigate the matter.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty inquired as to whether the Municipal Enforcement Department had enough staff to enforce the clean up as soon as possible.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. England indicated that staffing levels are currently suitable for the particular matters being worked on now. He noted that for the future by-law, there will be some comments on how that can be enforced moving forward.
- Result or follow-up
- Check later records for a result.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked whether the proposed cabin-zone policy would receive public consultation.
- Answer recorded
- Mathew Dodds clarified that the memo itself had not been shared with the Amaruq Hunters and Trappers Association; staff had summarized the policy’s intent and asked for its cooperation and future feedback.
- Result or follow-up
- The answer described engagement with the hunters and trappers association but did not record a date or format for broader public consultation.
He asked if consideration was being given in the policy to allow people to pitch tents.
- Answer recorded
- Mr. Dodds clarified that the memo has not been shared with the Amaruq Hunters and Trappers Association. He advised that staff provided them with a summary of the intent of the policy and requested their cooperation and future discussions. Mr. Dodds noted that the Amarug Hunters and Trappers Association indicated that they would cooperate and provide feedback.
- Result or follow-up
- Check later records for a result.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty inquired about how frequently the same applicant could apply for the grant.
- Answer recorded
- Ms. Toffolo advised that there was no restriction on the frequency by applicants and any project cannot receive more than $750,000 in funding. She clarified that the approval of applications by the Director of Planning and Development was envisioned as a collaboration between staff and the applicant to ensure the application meets the requirements prior to approval. She noted that projects would require a Development Permit and could be referred to the Committee for approval.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
He asked about the Director of Planning and Development approving the applications as outlined in Clause 9 (e).
- Answer recorded
- Ms. Toffolo advised that there was no restriction on the frequency by applicants and any project cannot receive more than $750,000 in funding. She clarified that the approval of applications by the Director of Planning and Development was envisioned as a collaboration between staff and the applicant to ensure the application meets the requirements prior to approval. She noted that projects would require a Development Permit and could be referred to the Committee for approval.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked if the Director of Planning and Development has signing authority for up to $750,000.
- Answer recorded
- Mathew Dodds, Director of Planning and Development, agreed that “discretion” should be amended in Clause 9 (e). He advised that he does not have signing authority for up to $750,000. He explained that the Director of Planning and Development would approve the application and the expenditure would be authorized by the Chief Administrative Officer.
- Result or follow-up
- The written minutes record the exchange; no separate later result is identified here.
Alternate Deputy Mayor Flaherty asked how increases in the aquatic centre’s $4.4-million Recreation and Cultural budget could be mitigated.
- Answer recorded
- Bill Williams, Senior Executive Director of Municipal Infrastructure and Planning, said staff would seek operational savings. He identified utility and fuel costs (because the building uses substantial water and electricity) and required aquatic-program staffing ratios as major cost drivers.
- Result or follow-up
- Staff said it would look for savings; no quantified reduction is recorded here.
Written-record minimum only. Multi-part exchanges may be compressed in the minutes, so the number retains a plus sign until audio is checked.
Read 43 questions from 2025
How many trips or loads were expected to remove the equipment?
- Answer recorded
- De Beers expected 40 to 50 loads in 2025, moved by four-tractor convoys.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had the required permits and licences been obtained?
- Answer recorded
- The proponent listed its CIRNAC land-use permit, Nunavut Planning Commission review and City application.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had De Beers consulted the hunters and trappers organizations about increased public trail use?
- Answer recorded
- The proponent said it met both Iqaluit and Pangnirtung organizations, which supported the trail, and discussed safety and emergency response.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would municipal authorities ensure compliance inside the municipal boundary?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said staff inspect new land-use permits; Administration said remote monitoring would require contracted services.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could council receive the Astro Hill Traffic Impact Study?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said Engineering had reviewed it and councillors could review the large document.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Should road modifications be undertaken by the City or the applicant's transportation engineer?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the applicant was responsible for water and sewer connections; the minutes do not record a direct answer allocating road-modification responsibility.
- Result or follow-up
- Road-modification responsibility was not directly resolved.
How many staff positions would receive the collective-agreement-related increase?
- Answer recorded
- Finance could not give an exact number and said a full complement was 160 to 200 employees depending on casual staffing.
- Result or follow-up
- An exact number was not provided.
Were the two absent councillors interested in serving on Governance and Priorities?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said deferral was council's decision; council deferred the appointments.
- Result or follow-up
- Appointments were deferred.
What recommendations had council made on the proposed eight-storey development?
- Answer recorded
- Planning summarized responses involving water, traffic, density, pedestrian safety, bedroom mix, storage and design.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had public consultation been held?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the developer held a public engagement session using preliminary plans.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did the Fire Department have equipment required for an eight-storey building?
- Answer recorded
- Planning cited fire-needs and capacity assessments, said the ladder truck was acceptable and said territorial officials would review the design.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could the building sit empty because its permit preceded the City's water-upgrade plan?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said Engineering did not expect it to sit empty and the permit could be extended.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could council receive the Fire Department Needs Assessment?
- Answer recorded
- The request is recorded, but delivery is not confirmed in these minutes.
- Result or follow-up
- Document delivery was not confirmed.
Was it standard practice for staff to seek council approval of funding requests?
- Answer recorded
- Finance said approval was obtained when required by the funder, as it was here.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
How was the dwelling legally non-conforming and encroaching into another yard?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it predated current rules and might reflect later surveying or older standards.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would the City be liable if the stream flooded the proposed addition?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the developer knew the risk, planned higher piles and the City would not be liable.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would officers patrol the liquor store and beaches by vehicle and ATV during summer?
- Answer recorded
- RCMP said patrols would continue, random check stops would increase and members were training on roadside screening devices.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would community consultation occur before the mixed-use development proceeded?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the area was designated high density and Uquutaq had conducted community engagement.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
When would the concept plan be available?
- Answer recorded
- Planning expected a development-permit application in approximately seven months, tied to funding.
- Result or follow-up
- The target remained conditional.
What commercial use would occupy the ground floor?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said no tenant was secured and the proponent sought a non-profit or low-cost commercial tenant.
- Result or follow-up
- The tenant remained unknown.
Could council control what NHC constructed on the vacant Apex lot?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said the lot was too small for a ballot, was intended for public housing and could fit a smaller prefabricated three-bedroom unit.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Were funds budgeted for the City to cover the remaining development charge?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said development charges fund capital projects and that various sources offset those projects, without identifying a specific budget line.
- Result or follow-up
- A specific funding source was not identified in the minutes.
Was the $7.50-per-cubic-metre extraction fee new?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said it was a new fee and the previous extraction fee had last been collected in 2017.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What revenue was expected during the ten-month quarry permit?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said little extraction remained for the permit period but did not provide a dollar estimate.
- Result or follow-up
- No revenue estimate was recorded.
Would a company face a penalty for earlier non-compliance before receiving a quarry permit?
- Answer recorded
- Administration described notices, discussions and arrears checks, and said no arrears were owing, but did not record a separate penalty.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What process determines whether a by-law needs amendment?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said new by-laws going to council should first be presented to committee.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What happens when a by-law arises from an ongoing council discussion without going to committee?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said new by-laws should be presented to committee before council.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Could administration investigate taxi vouchers without printed expiry dates being rejected and print expiry information when applicable?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said vouchers without a printed date did not expire; Caribou Cabs agreed to continue honouring them and the City said it would issue an update.
- Result or follow-up
- A public-information update was promised.
Did the capital plan include both new and ongoing projects?
- Answer recorded
- Finance said the draft showed both 2025 and 2026 projects and staff continued moving non-capital items to the operating budget.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What qualifies as a capital project?
- Answer recorded
- Finance cited long-term tangible assets, construction, design and some plans and studies.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did the colour chart identify multi-year projects?
- Answer recorded
- Finance said it did not and promised to add a way to identify them.
- Result or follow-up
- A multi-year marker was promised.
Had staff considered replacing outdated dispatch equipment?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said it was unaware of a problem but Silent Knight upgrades were planned that year.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Was underground work considered before paving Apex and Plateau?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said safety was the priority, no underground work was anticipated and drainage improvements would accompany paving.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Why was lagoon aeration construction scheduled for 2027, and could it begin sooner?
- Answer recorded
- Administration said design and engineering were budgeted for 2026, construction for 2027 and dredging would be funded in operations.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What makes a pipeline critical?
- Answer recorded
- Administration cited individual renewals and patches, historical failures, studies, modelling of older areas and Public Works priorities.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Where would the roughly $83-million capital budget funding come from?
- Answer recorded
- Finance identified approximately 56% federal, 7.25% territorial and 36.52% City funding, with reserves and operating revenues supporting cash flow.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What precautions would apply if fuel or oil spilled at the Canadrill temporary site?
- Answer recorded
- Planning cited territorial environmental law, investigation and applicant-funded remediation.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
What assurance prevented the eight-month permit from being extended?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said any extension would return with other renewal requests and was not guaranteed.
- Result or follow-up
- No absolute assurance was recorded.
How were potential applicants told that land was available for temporary permits?
- Answer recorded
- The deputy mayor and Planning described an open application process, prior land inventory and the Land Administration Policy.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Would the City retain access to lots for temporary construction laydown?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said West 40 lots were intended for long-term leases and other temporary areas were being explored.
- Result or follow-up
- Alternative temporary laydown locations were still being explored.
Where did non-profit organizations fit within the West 40 plan?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said some non-profits might bid on eco-tourism lots while on-the-land organizations generally sought roadless locations.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Had environmental assessments been conducted in the West 40?
- Answer recorded
- Planning referred back to environmental assessments discussed at the previous meeting.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Did the lot-disposal criteria provide preference to Inuit under the Nunavut Agreement?
- Answer recorded
- Planning said no such preference applied to commercial and industrial lots under the existing by-law.
- Result or follow-up
- Answered in the written minutes.
Every entry is a concise paraphrase of the written minutes. The Jan. 14 workshop has attendance only, and the May 8 Governance minute link is unavailable. Missing records are not evidence of silence.
Should road modifications be undertaken by the City or the applicant's transportation engineer?
Recorded answer: Planning said the applicant was responsible for water and sewer connections; the minutes do not record a direct answer allocating road-modification responsibility.
Follow-up: Road-modification responsibility was not directly resolved.
Official minutes ↗How many staff positions would receive the collective-agreement-related increase?
Recorded answer: Finance could not give an exact number and said a full complement was 160 to 200 employees depending on casual staffing.
Follow-up: An exact number was not provided.
Official minutes ↗Were the two absent councillors interested in serving on Governance and Priorities?
Recorded answer: Administration said deferral was council's decision; council deferred the appointments.
Follow-up: Appointments were deferred.
Official minutes ↗Could council receive the Fire Department Needs Assessment?
Recorded answer: The request is recorded, but delivery is not confirmed in these minutes.
Follow-up: Document delivery was not confirmed.
Official minutes ↗When would the concept plan be available?
Recorded answer: Planning expected a development-permit application in approximately seven months, tied to funding.
Follow-up: The target remained conditional.
Official minutes ↗What commercial use would occupy the ground floor?
Recorded answer: Planning said no tenant was secured and the proponent sought a non-profit or low-cost commercial tenant.
Follow-up: The tenant remained unknown.
Official minutes ↗Were funds budgeted for the City to cover the remaining development charge?
Recorded answer: Planning said development charges fund capital projects and that various sources offset those projects, without identifying a specific budget line.
Follow-up: A specific funding source was not identified in the minutes.
Official minutes ↗What revenue was expected during the ten-month quarry permit?
Recorded answer: Planning said little extraction remained for the permit period but did not provide a dollar estimate.
Follow-up: No revenue estimate was recorded.
Official minutes ↗Could administration investigate taxi vouchers without printed expiry dates being rejected and print expiry information when applicable?
Recorded answer: Administration said vouchers without a printed date did not expire; Caribou Cabs agreed to continue honouring them and the City said it would issue an update.
Follow-up: A public-information update was promised.
Official minutes ↗Did the colour chart identify multi-year projects?
Recorded answer: Finance said it did not and promised to add a way to identify them.
Follow-up: A multi-year marker was promised.
Official minutes ↗What assurance prevented the eight-month permit from being extended?
Recorded answer: Planning said any extension would return with other renewal requests and was not guaranteed.
Follow-up: No absolute assurance was recorded.
Official minutes ↗Would the City retain access to lots for temporary construction laydown?
Recorded answer: Planning said West 40 lots were intended for long-term leases and other temporary areas were being explored.
Follow-up: Alternative temporary laydown locations were still being explored.
Official minutes ↗Council members should be more vocal, and construction-related trash and unsightly land rules needed stronger enforcement.
Flaherty linked a media report about councillor visibility with litter on Inuit-owned land and near an Apex construction site.
Official minutes ↗This selected section can include debate and other agenda items; it is not the formal Statements ledger. Remarks are kept separate from the question count. Labels distinguish exact wording, condensed wording and paraphrase.
19 written-record entries
Only remarks filed under the regular council agenda’s formal STATEMENTS item. This is separate from debate remarks, questions and the editorial “notable statements” selection above.
2019–2023 voting record · Both terms and combined totals · Compare votes by issue
44 for · 9 opposed · 2 abstained
Across 55 reviewed decision positions: 11 named in the written record and 33 support positions reconstructed from unanimous results. This is a partial record, not every substantive vote during this member’s term.
Conflicts 4, absences 80 and chairing without a vote 2 are excluded from the chart. These are statuses on indexed motions, not meeting attendance totals.
See 107 reviewed unanimous motions and their source
Motion 26-180 · First reading of land disposal By-law 1037
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-181 · Second reading of land disposal By-law 1037
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-182 · Judo Nunavut curling rink fee waiver of $300
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-183 · Ulu Lane utility easement survey SK 26-004
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-184 · Astro Hill Sky I and II apartment permit DP 26-026 and utility easement
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-185 · Sivumugiaq road and sidewalk survey SK 26-012 A and B
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-186 · Explore electronic delivery of in-camera documents
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-187 · Prepare scope and budget for a multi-year by-law review
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-39 · Seek Justice funding for municipal enforcement and RCMP public safety pilot
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-40 · General Plan amendment for Lots 1 and 3, Block 239, second reading
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-41 · Zoning amendment for Lots 1 and 3, Block 239, second reading
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-42 · Appoint three members at large to the 2026 Board of Revision
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-43 · Defer the vacant council seat matter to the next meeting
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-44 · Cannabis establishment zoning amendment, first reading and public hearing
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-45 · Advance draft General Plan, growth area studies and public engagement
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-46 · Revise aquatic centre fees and present by-law for first reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-47 · Approve $3.925 million in wastewater upgrade projects
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-48 · Update Compassionate Funeral Subsidy Program policy
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-49 · Add $860,000 to capital budget for Ulu Lane piped water work
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-50 · Approve Governance and Priorities Committee terms of reference
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-51 · Fold existing committees into Governance and Priorities Committee
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-52 · Assess public and private boat storage operations
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-53 · Approve Nipisa Street daycare permit and variance
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-54 · Approve Lot 461 gravel fill, retaining wall and setback variance
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-55 · Approve Pump Station 1 access easement survey sketch
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-56 · Inuit Heritage Trust application for reservoir access-road archaeology survey
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-57 · Inuit Heritage Trust application for Kivalliq-Baffin Connector archaeological assessment
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-58 · Inuit Heritage Trust application for airport-area archaeological assessment
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-59 · Inuit Heritage Trust application for Silver Wind inbound voyage
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-60 · Inuit Heritage Trust application for Silver Wind outbound voyage
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-61 · Nunavut Research Institute application for tuberculosis screening and care study
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-62 · Nunavut Research Institute application for geothermal potential study
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-63 · Support Qajuqturvik's staff housing feasibility funding application
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-65 · Send letter of congratulations to Arviat on Inuit Nunangat University campus
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-68 · Award $599,200 plus GST for Apex supplemental pumping
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-74 · Hold public call-out for vacant council seat, closing May 22
Carried unanimously · 6–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-76 · Fees and charges amendment By-law 1034, first reading
Carried unanimously · 6–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-77 · Lot 2, Block 252 land disposal By-law 1035, first reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-78 · Lot 2, Block 252 land disposal By-law 1035, second reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-79 · Approve May to December council meeting calendar
Carried unanimously · 6–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-80 · Authorize Jamie Evic as acting chief administrative officer when designated
Carried unanimously · 6–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-81 · Inuit Heritage Trust application for Heart of the Arctic expedition
Carried unanimously · 6–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-82 · Inuit Heritage Trust application for Circling the Midnight Sun expedition
Carried unanimously · 6–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-83 · Nunavut Research Institute application for youth wellness study
Carried unanimously · 6–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-87 · Nunavut Research Institute application for intangible cultural heritage research
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-88 · Cannabis establishment zoning By-law 1033, second reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-89 · Fees and charges amendment By-law 1034, second reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-91 · Lot 2, Block 252 land disposal By-law 1035, final reading
Carried unanimously · 2–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-92 · Fees and charges amendment By-law 1034, final reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-93 · Accept 2025 audited financial statements
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-94 · Direct next reading and hearing for Lot 860 apartment zoning, withhold final reading pending permit
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-95 · Approve four-storey mixed-use apartment permit DP 26-006 and survey sketch
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-98 · Accept management letter for 2025 audited financial statements
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-105 · West 40 General Plan amendment By-law 1025, final reading
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-106 · West 40 zoning amendment By-law 1026, final reading
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-107 · Lots 1 and 3, Block 239 General Plan amendment By-law 1031, final reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-108 · Lots 1 and 3, Block 239 zoning amendment By-law 1032, final reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-109 · Approve $10,000 plus in-kind trade-show sponsorship, total $18,954.40
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-110 · Submit 2026 Community Economic Development Officer budget to Nunavut
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-111 · Approve $8,566 in-kind sponsorship for Alianait Arts Festival
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-112 · Approve public engagement scope of work
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-113 · Support Nunavut Black History Society funding application for Emancipation Festival
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-114 · Nunavut Research Institute application for women veterans homelessness study
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-115 · Nunavut Research Institute application for 2SLGBTQIA+ poverty study
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-120 · Lot 860 zoning By-law 1036, second reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-122 · Nunavut Research Institute application for housing and food security study
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-127 · Approve $3,000 youth community mural partnership
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-128 · Amend 2026 operating budget by $916,000
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-129 · Amend 2026 capital budget by $6.625 million
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-130 · Approve Lot 860 two apartment buildings development permit and land dedication
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-131 · Award $6,441,300 plus GST for road improvements to Pilitak
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-132 · Award $7,670,235 plus GST for critical pipeline renewal to Tower Arctic
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-133 · Appoint Kuthula Matshazi to vacant council seat
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-134 · Lot 19, Block 7 zoning By-law 1019, final reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-135 · Lot 483, Plan 911 zoning By-law 1033, final reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-136 · Lot 860 zoning By-law 1036, final reading
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-137 · Approve Council Support Letter Policy
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-138 · Baffin Building Systems land-use permit, 7.5% rental rate
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-139 · Baffin Building Systems quarry permit, $7.50 per cubic metre fee
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-140 · Kudlik Construction land-use permit LUP 26-002, 7.5% rental rate
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-141 · Kudlik Construction land-use permit LUP 26-003, 3.3% rental rate
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-142 · Kudlik Construction quarry permit, $7.50 per cubic metre fee
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-143 · Tower Arctic land-use permit LUP 26-004, 7.5% rental rate
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-144 · Tower Arctic land-use permit LUP 26-005, 3.3% rental rate
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-145 · Tower Arctic quarry permit, $7.50 per cubic metre fee
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-146 · Nunavut Excavating land-use permit LUP 26-006, 7.5% rental rate
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-147 · Nunavut Excavating land-use permit LUP 26-007, 7.5% rental rate
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-148 · Nunavut Excavating quarry permit, $7.50 per cubic metre fee
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-149 · Dispose of West 40 utility lot to CBC at market value on 99-year lease
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-150 · Approve Lot 5, Block 134 survey sketch SK 26-006
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-151 · Approve warehouse extension development permit and variance
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-152 · Approve Ulu Lane daycare development permit and variance
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-153 · Approve Qaggiavuut on-the-land facility sketch and ten-year lease
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-154 · Approve Qajuqturvik on-the-land facility sketch and ten-year lease
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-155 · Approve Iqaluit Ski Association facility relocation, lease and land-use permit
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-156 · Award Tundra Ridge expansion to Tom Fitzgerald Construction
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-157 · Nunavut Research Institute application for cryohydrogeologic conditions study
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-162 · Deny extension appeal for Jack Anawak Street clean-up order
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-165 · Approve ATII Nunavut livery licence subject to by-law requirements
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-167 · Dispose of surplus City assets by publicly advertised sealed tender
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-168 · Waive recreation fees for structured exercise program for cancer survivors
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-169 · Sponsor 2026 Qalugiaq Bowhead Whale Hunt for $10,000
Carried unanimously · 4–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-170 · Nunavut Research Institute application for Arctic self-determination study
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-171 · Nunavut Research Institute application for Filipino immigration study
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-172 · Inuit Heritage Trust application for World Navigator expedition
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-173 · Inuit Heritage Trust application for Silver Wind expedition
Carried unanimously · 5–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗Motion 26-176 · Award two-year janitorial services contract to C&K Services
Carried unanimously · 3–0
Official motion registry ↗ · Official minutes ↗These are selected topic decisions, not this member’s full recorded voting total. Two unanimous results use the recorded attendance and result to infer support; conflicts and absences remain separate. See the individually recorded positions below for the broader named index. Voting does not capture questions, advocacy, implementation or work outside the chamber.
See 34 individually recorded entries and their sources
Motion GP 26-44 · Committee recommends Astro Hill Sky I and II apartment permit and utility easement
Carried · 3–1
Official minutes ↗Motion PD 24-12 · Committee decision: refer Astro Hill mixed-use permit back to staff
Defeated · 3–5
Official minutes ↗Motion PD 24-13 · Recommend Astro Hill mixed-use permit with traffic study
Carried · 5–3
Official minutes ↗Motion 25-27 · Property Tax Exemption By-law, third and final reading
Carried · 3–2
Official minutes ↗Motion PD 25-08 · Acquire vacant federal Upper Base lot for one dollar
Carried · 5–1
Official minutes ↗Motion 25-258 · Public Safety Committee restructuring
Defeated · 3–4 after mayor's deciding vote
Official minutes ↗Motion 26-75 · Cannabis-establishment zoning, first reading
Carried · 5 for · 1 abstained
Official minutes ↗This section does not treat moving or seconding a motion as a vote. Reconstructed support from reviewed unanimous results is labelled in the section above. “Absent,” “Conflict,” “Abstained” and “Not in office” are kept separate.
Presence, moving a motion, questioning and voting are different records
Attendance reproduces the City’s quarterly grids and separates formal council meetings from committees, hearings and workshops. Motion counts cover 35 written motion records from 2025 and available 2026 registries through August 25. “Substantive” removes agenda and minutes approval, in-camera transitions and adjournment. The question number is a minimum from written minutes; audio may raise it. None of these numbers proves how much work a member did outside the chamber.
For a mayor, council voting is treated separately: the mayor normally votes only to break a tie. Committee participation can create a different voting record.